From: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] insane: make GNU_HASH check slightly more robust (avoids false negatives with gold); add check for useless rpaths
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:21:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310728890.3805.1.camel@phil-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6D6FE0B9-0A59-4376-972B-2262C766FDEF@dominion.thruhere.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 183 bytes --]
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 21:26 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> The new rpath warning is nice, but a bit too terse:
Yes, agreed. Try this patch and see if the situation improves.
p.
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-insane-improve-diagnostic-for-redundant-rpath.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1653 bytes --]
From 5083f058ed0c559583cc9b3f4f2ae87bbbc701f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:19:35 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] insane: improve diagnostic for redundant rpath
Make it more obvious which file, and which recipe, are at issue.
Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
---
meta/classes/insane.bbclass | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
index c45f2cb..65eda9e 100644
--- a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ def package_qa_check_rpath(file,name, d, elf, messages):
messages.append("package %s contains bad RPATH %s in file %s" % (name, line, file))
QAPATHTEST[useless-rpaths] = "package_qa_check_useless_rpaths"
-def package_qa_check_useless_rpaths(file,name, d, elf, messages):
+def package_qa_check_useless_rpaths(file, name, d, elf, messages):
"""
Check for RPATHs that are useless but not dangerous
"""
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ def package_qa_check_useless_rpaths(file,name, d, elf, messages):
if rpath == libdir or rpath == base_libdir:
# The dynamic linker searches both these places anyway. There is no point in
# looking there again.
- messages.append("dynamic section contains probably-redundant RPATH %s" % rpath)
+ messages.append("%s: %s contains probably-redundant RPATH %s" % (name, package_qa_clean_path(file, d), rpath))
QAPATHTEST[dev-so] = "package_qa_check_dev"
def package_qa_check_dev(path, name, d, elf, messages):
--
1.7.4.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-15 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-14 9:02 [PATCH v2] insane: make GNU_HASH check slightly more robust (avoids false negatives with gold); add check for useless rpaths Phil Blundell
2011-07-14 14:07 ` Richard Purdie
2011-07-14 19:26 ` Koen Kooi
2011-07-15 11:21 ` Phil Blundell [this message]
2011-07-15 12:34 ` Koen Kooi
2011-07-20 14:48 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1310728890.3805.1.camel@phil-desktop \
--to=philb@gnu.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox