From: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: Performance datapoint - impact of static libs
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:37:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310737071.3805.38.camel@phil-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310736662.20015.1232.camel@rex>
> So static libs add an extra ~30mins of processing (7%) and ~5 mins to
> the overall build time. Not as much of a gain as I'd have liked but
> interesting none the less.
Do you know how many packages actually respect the --disable-static
flag? I don't think (e)glibc does, for example, which is a bit of a
shame since it obviously has one of the largest build times.
p.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-15 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-15 13:31 Performance datapoint - impact of static libs Richard Purdie
2011-07-15 13:37 ` Phil Blundell [this message]
2011-07-20 14:50 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1310737071.3805.38.camel@phil-desktop \
--to=philb@gnu.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox