From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qj8D7-0003qk-7I for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:11:33 +0200 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qj89C-0002Bb-6b for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:07:30 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:07:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1dd2e2b995b65326b14426fe01116b99a920d779.1311034342.git.raj.khem@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1311073650.30326.26.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/16] uclibc_0.9.32: Implement sync_file_range2. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:11:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 17:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > ++#if defined __NR_sync_file_range2 > ++#define __NR_sync_file_range __NR_sync_file_range2 > ++#endif Does that really work? If I remember right, the argument lists for those two syscalls are not the same. It isn't entirely obvious to me that it makes sense to just define one as an alias for the other. p.