From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net)
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <philb@gnu.org>) id 1QmP01-0005v1-2V
	for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:43:33 +0200
Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145])
	by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <philb@gnu.org>) id 1QmOvv-00033M-Sd
	for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:39:19 +0200
From: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:39:19 +0100
References: <cover.1311683981.git.richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
	<346abefc87d21d0cc111ef87a6e48f40c5b6cb0b.1311683981.git.richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- 
Message-ID: <1311853159.30326.442.camel@phil-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add ARM tune file overhaul based largely on work from Mark Hatle
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:43:33 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 15:34 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 13:44 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > +PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv4tb = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv4} armv4tb"
> 
> That should be "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv4b} armv4tb", I think.
> Otherwise you will get a mixture of big and little endian in there.

I think the equivalent big-endian definitions for v5 and v6 have this
problem too.  For example:

PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6b = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5e-vfp} armv6b-vfp"
PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv6tb = "${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv5te-vfp} armv6b-vfp armv6tb-vfp"

seems wrongish to me.  

p.