From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qr96D-00027M-B3 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:45:33 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7ADf3eF021873; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:41:03 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20866-10; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:40:59 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7ADeuB3021867 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:40:57 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Gary Thomas In-Reply-To: <4E4288F0.2010904@mlbassoc.com> References: <1312912632.14274.312.camel@rex> <27DA7A3C-0FE9-43CA-963C-F6217A1D2C9F@kernel.crashing.org> <1312981676.14274.376.camel@rex> <1312982631.14274.379.camel@rex> <4E4288F0.2010904@mlbassoc.com> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:40:20 +0100 Message-ID: <1312983621.14274.383.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: populate_sdk: We need to ensure that the SDK sysroot reflects PACKAGE_ARCH X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:45:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 07:34 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: > On a related thought to these changes - how does this play if > you use multiple SDKs for different, but somewhat related, architectures? > I'd like to create a simple SDK (just toolchain mostly) using 'meta-toolchain' > for both armv5te and armv7a and install them simultaneously on the same > host. My previous attempts at this fell flat as there were a number of > files marked as "arm" (i.e. not armv5te or arvm7a) that were common between > the two SDK packages, but they didn't seem to be identical. This is supposed to work but wouldn't due to the issue and the patch I've proposed. Whether that is the only issue I don't know. Can you remember which files we're talking about here? > With these changes, will it be possible to support such sets of multiple > toolchains? (No, ADT is not the answer - I just want the toolchains) ADT uses meta-toolchain-* so its all related. Cheers, Richard