From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qrstk-0005iZ-RY for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:39:44 +0200 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QrspO-0000bT-BQ for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:35:14 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:35:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1313159586.14274.494.camel@rex> References: <1313153364.14274.486.camel@rex> <4E452F82.7060208@windriver.com> <1313159586.14274.494.camel@rex> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1313159714.6733.157.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] local.conf.sample: Cleanup and improve X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:39:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 15:33 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > Should patch resolution be noop by default? (I suspect due to my above concern > > w/ ipkg, changing the behavior now is likely a bad idea.) > > Good question. I suspect most people prefer noop and it would make more > sense for unattended builds... Agreed, I think noop is probably the best/least surprising default behaviour. p.