Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: Machine specific sysroot issue
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:03:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313420625.6733.182.camel@phil-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201108142050.37352.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>

On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 20:50 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> libopie2, a non-machine specific package, among other things installs a file 
> called include.pro into ${OPIEDIR}, which is configured to be 
> ${STAGING_DIR_HOST}. In OE-classic ${STAGING_DIR_HOST} is not machine-specific, 
> so if you build libopie2 for machine A then build some other package that 
> needs include.pro for machine B, then everything is fine. In the OE-core case 
> with machine-specific sysroots it's looking for the file in the sysroot for the 
> current machine, which if you've been building for several different machines 
> may not be where it has actually been installed.

I can't immediately think why this should be behaving differently to any
other library (eglibc for example).  It's quite normal for those
packages to be architecture-specific and not machine-specific.

What I think is meant to happen when you change MACHINE is that
populate_sysroot will rerun (because ${MACHINE} is factored into the
stamp for that task) but it will use all the previously cached build
artifacts from sstate and hence you won't end up having to rebuild
everything.  It sounds as if that isn't happening in this case for some
reason, though I can't immediately think what libopie2 might be doing to
defeat it.

Is it just include.pro that goes wrong, or does the whole of libopie2 go
missing from the sysroot when you change MACHINE?

p.





  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-15 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-14 19:50 Machine specific sysroot issue Paul Eggleton
2011-08-14 22:05 ` Khem Raj
2011-08-15 14:15 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-15 14:23   ` Paul Eggleton
2011-08-15 14:30     ` Koen Kooi
2011-08-15 14:42       ` Paul Eggleton
2011-08-15 14:58         ` Koen Kooi
2011-08-15 15:03 ` Phil Blundell [this message]
2011-08-15 15:49   ` Paul Eggleton
2011-08-15 15:51     ` Khem Raj
2011-08-15 15:52     ` Phil Blundell
2011-08-15 15:57     ` Richard Purdie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1313420625.6733.182.camel@phil-desktop \
    --to=philb@gnu.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox