From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QuRll-0000F0-Sa for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:18:06 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7JGDPfV030080 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:13:25 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 28745-02 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:13:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7JGD8c3030035 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:13:11 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <4E4E80C9.7010507@gmail.com> References: <5e892786b427b2049ddf0e660d57877e24f89385.1313700595.git.sgw@linux.intel.com> <1313745878.6733.259.camel@phil-desktop> <1313763965.13995.100.camel@rex> <4E4E80C9.7010507@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:13:06 -0700 Message-ID: <1313770386.13995.112.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [CONSOLIDATED PULL 15/32] conf, recipes: Redefine LINKER_HASH_STYLE X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:18:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 08:27 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > Also, if mips doesn't support this, how is anything at all working at > > the moment? > > see last line in distro/include/tcmode-default.inc > > TARGET_LINK_HASH_STYLE ?= > "${@['-Wl,--hash-style=gnu',''][bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, True) > in ['mips', 'mipsel', 'mips64', 'mips64el']]}" So given that, why can't we just add TARGET_LINK_HASH_STYLE to gcc's EXTRA_OECONF? Cheers, Richard