From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QuptA-0003wu-9P for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 20:03:20 +0200 Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=[192.168.114.3]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qupoe-0003bt-A3 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 19:58:40 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <4E4FDA4D.9020508@gmail.com> References: <91e2a59d20e1d1992691684fb2dd64a6405ec6e3.1313791350.git.dvhart@linux.intel.com> <4E4FDA4D.9020508@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:58:32 +0100 Message-ID: <1313863112.24904.5.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tune: remove thumb flag from non-thumb cortexa8 tune variables X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:03:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 09:01 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On 8/19/2011 3:06 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > > The thumb flag "t" appears to have been copy/pasted to all the > > PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS tune variables. Remove it from the non-thumb versions. > > > > hmmm non thumb versions can run thumb packages. So I think its ok to > have t in EXTRA_ARCHS Er, really? If it can run thumb code, in what sense is it a "non thumb" version? p.