From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QwW9a-00045w-6Q for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:23:14 +0200 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QwW4z-0006y0-40 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:18:29 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:18:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <4e4e5424.8c5cdf0a.7d94.ffffbafd@mx.google.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1314263909.19905.25.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] utils.bbclass: skip empty paths when handling FILESEXTRAPATHS X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:23:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 15:11 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > But then, there's a tendency nowadays to avoid map/filter/etc, > so that's probably not best :) Oh, is there? What's the objection to those constructs, out of interest? I am quite fond of them myself. p.