From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R0fBk-0002sD-VG for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 21:50:37 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p85Jjaex001166; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:45:36 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 00973-05; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:45:32 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.40] (dynamic10.rpnet.com [192.168.1.40]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p85JjVpS001159 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:45:31 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Gary Thomas In-Reply-To: <4E4BE1DA.1030109@mlbassoc.com> References: <1312912632.14274.312.camel@rex> <27DA7A3C-0FE9-43CA-963C-F6217A1D2C9F@kernel.crashing.org> <1312981676.14274.376.camel@rex> <1312982631.14274.379.camel@rex> <4E4288F0.2010904@mlbassoc.com> <1312983621.14274.383.camel@rex> <4E428C20.5030809@mlbassoc.com> <4E4BE1DA.1030109@mlbassoc.com> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:45:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1315251930.1243.20.camel@ted> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: populate_sdk: We need to ensure that the SDK sysroot reflects PACKAGE_ARCH X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 19:50:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 09:44 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2011-08-10 07:48, Gary Thomas wrote: > > On 2011-08-10 07:40, Richard Purdie wrote: > >> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 07:34 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: > >>> On a related thought to these changes - how does this play if > >>> you use multiple SDKs for different, but somewhat related, architectures? > >>> I'd like to create a simple SDK (just toolchain mostly) using 'meta-toolchain' > >>> for both armv5te and armv7a and install them simultaneously on the same > >>> host. My previous attempts at this fell flat as there were a number of > >>> files marked as "arm" (i.e. not armv5te or arvm7a) that were common between > >>> the two SDK packages, but they didn't seem to be identical. > >> > >> This is supposed to work but wouldn't due to the issue and the patch > >> I've proposed. Whether that is the only issue I don't know. > > > > I'll be glad to test this once you've worked it out. > > Any progress on this yet? The discussion seems to have died down... I merged the patch in question so I'm open to feedback on whether this works better now... Cheers, Richard