From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R8Aap-0004jh-H6 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:47:31 +0200 Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p8QCmQQB021013 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:48:26 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id QF2e5WXYytGo for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:48:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.40] (tim [93.97.173.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p8QCmKCW021005 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:48:22 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:41:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1316807201-22623-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.1.91- Message-ID: <1317040924.26109.33.camel@ted> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] default-provider: also define a default provider for gconf-native X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:47:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 16:11 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > Please delay this patch for a while. Too late :(. > Now I get the following warning in > my build logs (If someone can tell me where the problem lies, that would > help). > > ERROR: Trying to resolve runtime dependency gconf resulted in > conflicting PREFERRED_PROVIDER entries being found. > The providers found were: > ['/home/users/mitya/OE/setup-scripts/sources/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-gnome/gnome/gconf-dbus_705.bb', > 'virtual:native:/home/users/mitya/OE/setup-scripts/sources/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-gnome/gnome/gconf-dbus_705.bb'] > The PREFERRED_PROVIDER entries resulting in this conflict were: > ['PREFERRED_PROVIDER_gconf = gconf-dbus', > 'PREFERRED_PROVIDER_gconf-native = gconf-dbus-native'] > NOTE: multiple providers are available for runtime gconf > (gconf-dbus-native, gconf-dbus, gconf) > NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match gconf This asks the question why is gconf-dbus-native providing "gconf" and not "gconf-native"? Cheers, Richard