From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R8aSV-0002Gc-TW for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:24:40 +0200 Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p8RGPYBg027824 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:25:35 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id vrohDUsgLpqU for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:25:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.40] (tim [93.97.173.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p8RGPSV4027818 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:25:30 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:19:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <201109271516.15542.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> References: <20110927140224.GA10415@edwin-gen> <201109271516.15542.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.1.91- Message-ID: <1317140351.26109.166.camel@ted> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] remove gnome-vfs completely X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:24:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 15:16 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Tuesday 27 September 2011 15:02:24 Zhai, Edwin wrote: > > BTW, > > I found many recipes in meta-demoapps are not maintained: no > > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM/SRCREV, no workable SRC_URI, and even no layer.conf under > > meta-demoapps. > > > > We need more test for demoapps, and require each commit to take care of > > them, or else remove them completely... > > My personal opinion as far as OE-core is concerned is that the whole of meta- > demoapps should be removed; perhaps the recipes within it can be provided in > another layer (which we can then use within the Yocto project if desired) but > they do not belong in OE-core IMHO. I agree it needs to become a separately layer and some of the components there might be better in other locations. Its something we meant to deal with later in the OE-Core development cycle and basically forgot. Maybe someone could file an enhancement bug? :) First step would be to move it whole to its own layer repo. Cheers, Richard