From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R9Lak-0002wt-HR for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:44:18 +0200 Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p8TIjAjg012331; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:45:10 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GAfbotPoFfNJ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:45:10 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.40] (tim [93.97.173.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p8TIj7XL012327 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:45:08 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: McClintock Matthew-B29882 , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:38:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1317270070-14250-1-git-send-email-msm@freescale.com> <1317311276.12332.97.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.1.91- Message-ID: <1317321528.12332.110.camel@ted> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] libnl2: Fix a race on route/pktloc_syntax.h X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:44:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 18:28 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 23:20 -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote: > >> From: Tom Rini > >> > >> At issue is that route/pktloc.c (not generated) depends on > >> route/pktloc_syntax.h (generated). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini > >> --- > >> .../libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++ > >> meta/recipes-support/libnl/libnl_2.0.bb | 3 +- > >> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch > >> > >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch b/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 0000000..d396f96 > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libnl/fix-pktloc_syntax_h-race.patch > >> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ > >> +--- > > > > Missing patch header... > > How would I mark this when this is an old version of libnl and it > appears not to be a problem the latest version of libnl? I don't have the patch status field entries handy but you can certainly document that the issue isn't present in version X so its likely been fixed upstream already. I guess "Inappropriate" would cover that if nothing else does. Cheers, Richard