From: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Bringing an image from OE to OE-Core
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:18:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1317845927.10776.3.camel@scimitar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E8CB801.7050003@balister.org>
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 16:03 -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 03:35 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Philip Balister<philip@balister.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> 1) I do not want rpm in the image. This would confuse my customer base.
> >> 2) I am tired of dropbear, I want openssh only.
> >> 3) I need the full versions of tools, not the busybox ones.
> >> 4) I am not limited to gpv2 software.
> >>
> >> Richard, it looks to me like we should add an item for the next Yocto
> >> development cycle to review how images are built and try to make the base
> >> stuff in oe-core more usable by everyone. We need to define what choices are
> >> made by distros. For example opkg, rpm, no package management in image.
> >> Images may want dropbear or openssh.
> >>
> >> Short term, I think I'll copy the tasks/images into my bsp and get some
> >> stuff together for testing. I'd like a better long term solution though.
> >
> > There always will be customizations needed. But we can strive for
> > better basic blocks
>
> Sure. The immediate things I noticed are rpm being installed and lack of
> a way to chose between dropbear/openssh.
Core images automatically include the correct package manager when the
image feature package-management is defined for the image.
It would be nice to define a variable/feature to control SSH server.
Regards,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-05 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-04 19:58 Bringing an image from OE to OE-Core Philip Balister
2011-10-04 20:08 ` Saul Wold
2011-10-04 20:27 ` Philip Balister
2011-10-04 20:32 ` Saul Wold
2011-10-04 22:43 ` Mark Hatle
2011-10-05 14:14 ` Philip Balister
2011-10-05 14:47 ` Eric Bénard
2011-10-05 15:49 ` Mark Hatle
2011-10-05 16:20 ` Koen Kooi
2011-10-05 21:07 ` Philip Balister
2011-10-05 16:39 ` Eric Bénard
2011-10-05 19:35 ` Khem Raj
2011-10-05 20:03 ` Philip Balister
2011-10-05 20:18 ` Joshua Lock [this message]
2011-10-05 20:24 ` Khem Raj
2011-10-05 22:51 ` Saul Wold
2011-10-07 5:51 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-10-04 20:15 ` Khem Raj
2011-10-04 20:27 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1317845927.10776.3.camel@scimitar \
--to=josh@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox