From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RDyBb-0007tj-Ur for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:45:28 +0200 Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p9CCkNBw003483 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:46:23 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id CVQWKz0FGKhC for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:46:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (tim [93.97.173.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p9CCkJti003478 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:46:21 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:39:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.1.91- Message-ID: <1318423185.23801.153.camel@ted> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] QA check for defined packages X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:45:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 15:29 -0700, Joshua Lock wrote: > Folks, > > I'm looking for some comments on this WIP patch. > > The reason I've added this is because the hob GUI requires us to offer much > more reliable metadata - we show the user available packages, as defined by > each recipe, to add to their image. Should a recipe define a package and yet > not actually create it and the user has included that in their image we cause > errors at build time. > > However whilst the idea seems sound enough, there are some caveats - running > a world build with this patch I see failures fairly early on at least a few > of which I'd expect we'll need to special-case: > * eglibc-local > * linux-yocto > * linux-libc-headers > * gcc-runtime You'd probably get much better results from this patch if you account for ALLOW_EMPTY_ btw... Cheers, Richard