From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RERK4-0000NI-Nq for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:52:08 +0200 Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=[192.168.114.3]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1REREY-00033H-RG for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:46:26 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <20111003150904.GR7364@jama.jama.net> References: <5fa396a1acd9897ae22dbec57c1fb36a7a0223ac.1317648040.git.Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> <3ffacbd5138165278774387c51b4bd3bb625eaff.1317648041.git.Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> <1317654131.13337.6.camel@phil-desktop> <20111003150904.GR7364@jama.jama.net> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:46:20 +0100 Message-ID: <1318535180.3158.4.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 26/30] glx-use-tls: add from meta-oe layer X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:52:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 17:09 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:02:10PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > > Can you add some commentary explaining why this is necessary -- i.e. > > what exactly is lacking in uClibc to mean it doesn't have "prober TLS > > support"? > > I'm not using uClibc myself and tracking original bbclass in OE-classic > leads to this commit > http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/packages/mesa/mesa-tls.inc?id=b527d8f723c98c77f2f5c5358062e5348493d767 > > So I'm CCing woglinde and he will probably explain it. I see this patch has been applied in the meantime so I guess it's a slightly academic question now, but I still think it would benefit from some further explanation. p.