From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RMM3W-0004zB-Eu for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:51:46 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pA4FjUSY021630; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 15:45:30 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18490-07; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 15:45:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pA4FjMTC021618 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Nov 2011 15:45:23 GMT Message-ID: <1320421523.20107.118.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:45:23 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1320407079-24810-1-git-send-email-koen@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <1320407079-24810-1-git-send-email-koen@dominion.thruhere.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Koen Kooi , "saul.wold" Subject: Re: [Patch v3] rootfs_ipk bbclass: special-case base-passwd preinst to run first X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:51:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 12:44 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > Preinst are run alphabetically which breaks when e.g. avahi-daemon needs /etc/passwd present. > > Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi > --- > meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass | 6 ++++++ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) I've merged this to master. I'm not particularly happy about it but right now I can't see a good way to fix this short/medium term. Saul: We'd better check if the rpm rootfs class needs this help Cheers, Richard