From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RMRIV-0007ZI-RW for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 22:27:35 +0100 Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=[192.168.114.3]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RMRCZ-0004m7-Va for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 22:21:28 +0100 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <7e3c2e21652019ed5dd2d45beff62a855152f0a4.1320430778.git.otavio@ossystems.com.br> References: <7e3c2e21652019ed5dd2d45beff62a855152f0a4.1320430778.git.otavio@ossystems.com.br> Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 21:17:12 +0000 Message-ID: <1320441432.3137.2.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dhcp: rename dhcp4.inc to dhcp.inc X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 21:27:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 18:20 +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > --- > .../dhcp/{dhcp4.inc => dhcp.inc} | 0 > meta/recipes-connectivity/dhcp/dhcp_4.2.0.bb | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > rename meta/recipes-connectivity/dhcp/{dhcp4.inc => dhcp.inc} (100%) Why is this patch an improvement? I don't have anything against it particularly but it doesn't seem that it buys much either, and there is no clue in the commit message as to what it is trying to achieve. p.