From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RQ0aF-0003ER-QE for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:44:39 +0100 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RQ0U8-0004h6-BS for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:38:20 +0100 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:38:19 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1321291170.26881.64.camel@ted> References: <1321274982.26881.55.camel@ted> <1321275166.29435.21.camel@phil-desktop> <8AFC2447-9963-4DF0-80E2-198516B3A813@dominion.thruhere.net> <1321279039.26881.62.camel@ted> <1321283752.29435.39.camel@phil-desktop> <1321291170.26881.64.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1321292300.29435.44.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] base-passwd: Move update-passwd into a separate package X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:44:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 17:19 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > Why can't opkg just wipe the postinst's its run off the disk? Its not > like it needs them any longer... Yes, that's true. In fact for my purposes I end up wiping the whole of the opkg metadata anyway so it is a moot issue. :-) But you're right, "opkg configure" is a one-shot operation and it will never use the postinst again so it might as well delete them for itself. p.