From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RQ3QA-0008DE-8Y for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:46:26 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAEKe1oN016067 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:40:01 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15395-07 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:39:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAEKdrBA016057 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:39:54 GMT Message-ID: <1321303197.26881.74.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:39:57 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <2ffb85152b2b9356efeb008891d8ed29f1f35cef.1321296476.git.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] distcc: make distccmon-gnome optional and default to off X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:46:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 20:17 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 14 nov. 2011, om 19:54 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven: > > > Most people building distcc will not need the distccmon-gnome GUI to be > > built, so make it optional via the new PACKAGECONFIG functionality and > > default it to disabled. (This also removes the need to disable it for > > uclibc.) > > > > Part of the fix for [YOCTO #1690]. > > I think splitting distccmon-gnome into a seperate recipe is a better idea. I think that makes sense in some cases but I'd hate for it to become the default approach for issues like this as the duplication of code, parsing and build time etc. grate on me. Do we really need separate recipes? I'll probably take this patch as it improves the situation IMO (and is easy to change the configuration from a distro config if anyone does have an issue with it being disabled). Cheers, Richard