From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.gw90.de ([188.40.100.199]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RR9rT-0007ej-Iz for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:51:11 +0100 Received: from f053033195.adsl.alicedsl.de ([78.53.33.195] helo=[192.168.178.21]) by mail.gw90.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RR9lQ-0006CU-0n for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:44:56 +0000 Message-ID: <1321566286.3335.12.camel@mattotaupa> From: Paul Menzel To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:44:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1321523310-29625-1-git-send-email-heinold@inf.fu-berlin.de> <1321547193.12103.5.camel@mattotaupa> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] useradd.bbclass: do not let depend native packages on base-passwd from target X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:51:11 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 12591 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qNb2zaZVHzrxs0fmZxGV" --=-qNb2zaZVHzrxs0fmZxGV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Donnerstag, den 17.11.2011, 14:37 -0700 schrieb Chris Larson: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Paul Menzel wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 17.11.2011, 10:48 +0100 schrieb Henning Heinold: > > > >> with the setup now in useradd.bbclass, at least dbus-native depends > >> on the base-passwd from target. I think this is not wanted. > >> My patch resets the DEPENDS line for native packages similar to > >> nativesdk. > > > > why do not you use that as the commit message? That would be very > > helpful for me at least. ;-) >=20 > The summary often describes the what, the detailed description the > how. The summary here is accurate, particularly regarding the > behavioral change, rather than the implementation details. I did refer to that. Looking at the patch=E2=80=99s commit message you will= see it is empty. So just sending the patch with no patch introduction and putting the message from the patch introduction into the patch=E2=80=99s co= mmit message would benefit everyone. Thanks, Paul --=-qNb2zaZVHzrxs0fmZxGV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk7FgE4ACgkQPX1aK2wOHVhMrACfd1kOBeydRq5tx+JD0yMeNzGR 65EAnj0U7a/7t7jHtyJuP53912p6s1mn =8H13 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-qNb2zaZVHzrxs0fmZxGV--