Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: openembedded-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: OE-Core, autobuilder testing and sstate issues
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:23:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322061836.15626.0.camel@ted> (raw)

I just wanted to give people who might be unaware a heads up on what I'm
trying to get done at the moment and why patches are moving a bit
slowly.

There have been a spate of rather ugly failures on the yocto autobuilder
and these are badly impacting our ability to feel happy about the state
of OE-Core. I've therefore been focusing a lot of effort on tracking
down how and where these issues are coming from and getting them fixed.

The first round of these were problems with useradd.bbclass which then
uncovered a raft of issues in the package managers (both opkg and rpm)
which took a while to resolve.

It then appears some are genuine sstate issues which only appear in the
large autobuilder setup but are much harder to reproduce locally. In the
past its been easy to just ignore them or wipe out sstate and hope the
problems go away. This time I've not allowed sstate to be removed from
the autobuilder until we get to the bottom of the issues.

I want us to get back to a position where patches are flowing as quickly
as possible. I also want these issues resolved, once and for all. In the
interests of expediency I've merged some patches fairly quickly,
particularly a couple related to gconf.

The autobuilder is getting greener all the time and I think we're just
about there with the issues that were showing up having been resolved
but the next couple of builds will confirm this.

So sorry for the delays in patches but I do strongly believe these fixes
will be extremely beneficial in the future and will improve our
regression spotting since we can iterate over and test changes faster.

Cheers,

Richard





                 reply	other threads:[~2011-11-23 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1322061836.15626.0.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox