From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Make pulseaudio a DISTRO_FEATURE
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:09:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322068148.15626.15.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322066940.26081.27.camel@phil-desktop>
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 16:48 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 16:33 +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 November 2011 16:59:56 Koen Kooi wrote:
> > > We also agreed that the current behaviour should be retained, so needing to
> > > add pulse to distro features would go against that. Having said that, I
> > > personally would dislike having negative ('nopulseaudio') entries to
> > > address that. Feedback needed :)
> >
> > I don't see how we can achieve this without making a huge mess. I'm happy to
> > be proven wrong, but I would really like us to figure this stuff out soon so we
> > can get the actual problem here fixed.
>
> Agreed. This problem (or variants of it) comes up fairly frequently: we
> had a similar amount of grief when ipv4 and ipv6 became DISTRO_FEATURES
> and everybody who wasn't paying attention found that they suddenly had
> no networking. But I think it is basically insoluble in the general
> case without any extra stateful mechanics: we need to either:
>
> a) decide that what we have today, or at some other arbitrary point, is
> the "base configuration" and any departure from that (including
> removals) will now be a DISTRO_FEATURE. This means accepting things
> like "nopulseaudio" which are, admittedly, ugly; or
>
> b) introduce some sort of concept of "feature epochs", where the DISTRO
> gets to declare what epoch it is expecting and the compatibility code
> then backfills DISTRO_FEATURES to take account of things that were
> enabled by default in past epochs but have since been removed. This
> introduces a certain extra maintenance burden but it means that DISTROs
> will no longer get unpleasant surprises; or
>
> c) just live with the status quo and accept that things will break when
> features are turned off.
>
> My personal preference would be for (b) but I could live with (a) just
> as well.
I'm wondering if we can do something in the core like:
DISTRO_FEATURES_BACKFILLOPTS = "pulseaudio"
and have the distro set:
DISTRO_FEATURES_BACKFILLCONSIDERED = ""
and then add some code which looks for anything in
DISTRO_FEATURES_BACKFILLOPTS but not in
DISTRO_FEATURES_BACKFILLCONSIDERED and adds it to DISTRO_FEATURES.
Distros can then opt out of a given feature by adding it to
DISTRO_FEATURES_BACKFILLCONSIDERED.
This would let us maintain compatibility but also move forward and
create new settings with names that make sense.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-23 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-23 15:32 [PATCH 0/3] Make pulseaudio a DISTRO_FEATURE Paul Eggleton
2011-11-23 15:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] default-distrovars: add pulseaudio to DISTRO_FEATURES Paul Eggleton
2011-11-23 15:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] qt4: make pulseaudio support conditional upon DISTRO_FEATURES Paul Eggleton
2011-11-23 15:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] gst-plugins-good: " Paul Eggleton
2011-11-23 15:59 ` [PATCH 0/3] Make pulseaudio a DISTRO_FEATURE Koen Kooi
2011-11-23 16:33 ` Paul Eggleton
2011-11-23 16:48 ` Phil Blundell
2011-11-23 17:09 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2011-11-23 17:45 ` Paul Eggleton
2011-11-23 17:49 ` Paul Eggleton
2011-11-23 17:53 ` Phil Blundell
2011-11-23 18:22 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-12-29 12:55 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-01-16 17:58 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-01-16 18:12 ` Phil Blundell
2012-01-17 23:13 ` Process for New DISTRO_FEATURES (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Make pulseaudio a DISTRO_FEATURE) Richard Purdie
2012-01-17 20:02 ` [PATCH 0/3] Make pulseaudio a DISTRO_FEATURE Tom Rini
2012-01-27 10:43 ` Samuel Stirtzel
2012-01-27 10:54 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-01-27 11:34 ` Samuel Stirtzel
2012-01-27 12:13 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-01-28 20:05 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1322068148.15626.15.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox