From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RTWpI-0004cV-I2 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:46:44 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAOAe9aG023298; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:40:09 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22525-04; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:40:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAOAdxET023279 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:40:01 GMT Message-ID: <1322131206.23791.3.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: McClintock Matthew-B29882 , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:40:06 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1322041226-10075-1-git-send-email-msm@freescale.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [RFC] gcc-cross.inc: Add depedency on BUILD_ARCH X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:46:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 07:29 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > > hmmm I guess cross recipes are special they should not have been built > > under target recipes. Adding build arch to package name would be ok > > too but may be if they were built under directory of their own which > > was something like -- then it would also solve > > the problem i think > > I agree - this is the discussion I'm trying to start. ;) I haven't had a chance to look into this in detail but the cross recipes have been bothering me for a *long* time. I keep taking chunks of time and dealing with issues. For example, packaging no longer happens in any of the cross recipes, thankfully. We can share the gcc sources directory and so on. Those changes all open up the possibility of moving them to the native build directory. The only missing piece left is suffixing the recipe names with the TARGET_ARCH (like gcc-cross-canadian does, its been proof of concept'd there). Cheers, Richard