From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RTZe1-0006RB-QZ for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:47:17 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAODeeJ4025123; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:40:40 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 24576-09; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:40:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAODeVfR025117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:40:33 GMT Message-ID: <1322142038.24143.23.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:40:38 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <5a1109761eb7eba8ddd028bea09ec12c63bc6bbb.1322032702.git.xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com> <27383A15-EAE2-4714-8E61-F9B194CFB581@dominion.thruhere.net> <4ECD4B23.1010604@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] directfb: change check sum X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:47:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 20:59 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 23 nov. 2011, om 20:36 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: > > > On 11/22/2011 11:37 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> > >> Op 23 nov. 2011, om 08:21 heeft Xiaofeng Yan het volgende > geschreven: > >> > >>> From: Xiaofeng Yan > >>> > >>> Change check sum of directfb. The previous check sum is wrong. > >> > >> Why is it wrong? What has changed? > >> > >> > > Seems that when the recipe update occurred, the checksums where not > properly updated at the same time, this is a valid and needed patch as > it corrects the checksums for the 1.4.15 tarball. > > Now put that in the commit message :) I merged this with an updated commit message. Cheers, Richard