From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RVQG5-0000ma-59 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 17:10:14 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pATG3Vvb015562; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:03:31 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14826-09; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:03:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pATG3OWr015556 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:03:25 GMT Message-ID: <1322582613.7964.3.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:03:33 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <4ED0CC76.4040606@emagii.com> <1322579029.7964.0.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: ulf@emagii.com, "Garman, Scott A" Subject: Re: Feedback on building openembedded-core for qemuarm. Excerpts from buildlog X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:10:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 16:50 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 29 nov. 2011, om 16:03 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > > > On Sat, 2011-11-26 at 12:24 +0100, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > >> Downloaded the latest, and tried building console-image for qemuarm. > >> Host = Ubuntu 11.04 i686. > >> > >> Looked through the build log, and thought I'd share it with the list. > > > > Thanks for doing this, its valuable feedback. > > > >> A number of warnings (see below) > > > > We're trying to work through addressing those. Some of them are from > > versions in meta-oe where there is a fix for the error in OECore (such > > as the libgcc linker hash style). > > Assuming your statement is true, why isn't the hash style fixed in > the .inc? Meta-oe uses the ones from OE-core, so if the include files > are sane, the toolchain for meta-oe is sane. Its fixed by a patch so someone needs to backport that patch to the gcc 4.5 patch set. Cheers, Richard