From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RW31J-00071B-3q for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:33:33 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB19QnYS012695; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:26:49 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11727-09; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:26:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB19QdYE012689 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:26:40 GMT Message-ID: <1322731606.17484.88.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:26:46 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20111201015251.GA30618@sakrah.homelinux.org> References: <4ED0CC76.4040606@emagii.com> <1322579029.7964.0.camel@ted> <1322582613.7964.3.camel@ted> <20111201015251.GA30618@sakrah.homelinux.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: ulf@emagii.com, "Garman, Scott A" Subject: Re: Feedback on building openembedded-core for qemuarm. Excerpts from buildlog X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:33:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 17:52 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On (29/11/11 16:03), Richard Purdie wrote: > > > Assuming your statement is true, why isn't the hash style fixed in > > > the .inc? Meta-oe uses the ones from OE-core, so if the include files > > > are sane, the toolchain for meta-oe is sane. > > > > Its fixed by a patch so someone needs to backport that patch to the gcc > > 4.5 patch set. > > I have intentionally not ported the patch back to 4.5 but let me see if > I can find some spare hours Don't take my comments as a request to do so btw, personally speaking I don't see it as a problem. I just wanted to be clear about what was missing. Cheers, Richard