From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RYa43-0000bh-CE for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:14:51 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB898153025980; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:08:01 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25841-01; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:07:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB897qKa025974 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:07:53 GMT Message-ID: <1323335282.971.11.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 09:08:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <664f652792df901dbc42d813b299093fa719a66a.1323323130.git.nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> <7e5d0671426509d061abbe8b320f65f2cfb3a8a0.1323323130.git.nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: hjl.tools@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] findutils: Fix compilation for x32 toolchain X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 09:14:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 23:14 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:48 PM, wrote: > > From: Nitin A Kamble > > > > Work around gnulib time_t assumption in findutils for x32 > > if its a workaround can it be applied only to x32 with help of overrides please Its not a workaround, the patch looks like a generic reasonable fix to correct assumptions made by the program that aren't true? Cheers, Richard