From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RYm2M-0000ot-LX for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:01:54 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB8Lt5eD006392 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 21:55:05 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02430-04 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 21:55:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB8Lsui2006375 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 21:54:57 GMT Message-ID: <1323381307.5309.62.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:55:07 +0000 In-Reply-To: <4EE124A8.7060200@windriver.com> References: <4EE124A8.7060200@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Rename leftover POKY references to OE in image variables X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:01:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 14:57 -0600, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 12/8/11 2:27 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: > >> The names POKY_BASE_INSTALL and POKY_EXTRA_INSTALL have been renamed > >> to OE_BASE_INSTALL and OE_EXTRA_INSTALL. > >> > > > > How about calling it IMAGE_* instead ? > > I don't have any objections to that. (All I did was rename POKY to OE, as I > believe that was originally intended...) > > Richard, anyone else, have any comments before I make that change? I'd suggest COREIMAGE since that is what it actually influences. The reason being this is used by core-image.bbclass (which used to be poky-image.bbclass). Cheers, Richard