From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RYxTu-0002TI-JT for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:15:06 +0100 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RYxNK-0002Ws-0Q for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:08:18 +0100 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:08:16 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <7ceb01f6db6edfad6c78c5a7ebc685c23bb11358.1323327959.git.xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com> <67C6F211-C6C2-4655-889A-A254F4E0D7D9@dominion.thruhere.net> <1323363345.5309.42.camel@ted> <1323364334.26081.383.camel@phil-desktop> <1323381564.5309.65.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1323425298.26081.409.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] gtk.inc: add feature based on directfb X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:15:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 07:51 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > So to be safe and give other directfb implementations a change, can > this PACKAGECONFIG option be named 'gtk-directfb' in DISTRO_FEATURES? I don't think I quite understand what you're saying there. Can you expand on why this would be a good thing? p.