From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RYxpL-00039J-1o for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:37:17 +0100 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RYxik-0002YV-Lk for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:30:26 +0100 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:30:25 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <7ceb01f6db6edfad6c78c5a7ebc685c23bb11358.1323327959.git.xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com> <67C6F211-C6C2-4655-889A-A254F4E0D7D9@dominion.thruhere.net> <1323363345.5309.42.camel@ted> <1323364334.26081.383.camel@phil-desktop> <1323381564.5309.65.camel@ted> <1323425298.26081.409.camel@phil-desktop> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1323426626.26081.414.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] gtk.inc: add feature based on directfb X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:37:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 11:25 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > gtk 2.x is one of the few places where directfb/x11/whatever conflict, > so if I want directfb support for sane things (gtk 3.x, qt, etc) the > current patch will make me jump through a ton of hoops. Well, you can set: # support both graphical backends where possible DISTRO_FEATURES = "directfb x11" # for gtk+ 2.x, have to pick either x11 or directfb not both PACKAGECONFIG_pn-gtk+ = "x11" in your distro config. I don't think that one extra line really counts as a "ton of hoops", and if you aren't using gtk+ 2.0 then you can just leave it out. p.