From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RZ3pw-0001or-B4 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:02:16 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB9GtMcG002509 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 16:55:22 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 01776-06 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 16:55:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB9GtEPx002503 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 16:55:15 GMT Message-ID: <1323449725.5309.187.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 16:55:25 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1323427912-10122-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1323440295.5309.164.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] connman: update to 0.78 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:02:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 14:38 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:18, Richard Purdie: > > f) Reorder variables in the file so as to make the diff > unreadable and > hard to review > > This was indeed done and I am sorry but it does seems more easy to > follow now. In future please do this as a separate commit which just changes the order. I will start just outright rejecting patches which combine code changes and unrelated ordering changes since it makes the patches unnecessarily hard to review. > So all things considered, this kind of change is a nightmare > to review > in this form and the commit message only covers half the > changes it > makes. We need to do better than this... > > > Not easy to accomplish as the difference between meta-oe and oe-core > on this was huge. It could have been done better, sure ... and a v2 > patch will come shortly. Thanks. I think the best way to improve this in future would be to keep code changes and ordering (or whitespace) changes in separate commits (and also enable rename detection on the change you send). Cheers, Richard