From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RZAZZ-0008A3-0x for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 01:13:49 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBA06wUB008018 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:06:58 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07544-07 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:06:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBA06o28008012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:06:51 GMT Message-ID: <1323475621.5309.198.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:07:01 +0000 In-Reply-To: <4EE25F11.80200@linux.intel.com> References: <4EE25F11.80200@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] scripts/send-pull-request: allow sending of patches without a cover letter X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:13:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 11:18 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > On 12/08/2011 07:40 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > Hi Otavio, > > Please provide a commit log body. > > http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines#Patch_Headers_and_Commit_Messages > > > > +else > > + echo "WARNING: No cover letter will be send." > > s/send/sent/ > > > Otherwise looks reasonable. Hmm, this has just merged with the typo, sorry (it had been around a while with no comments). Can someone sent a follow up please? Cheers, Richard