From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RaDYf-0003Yz-Du for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:37:13 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBCLUJt5001364 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:30:19 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 00461-03 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:30:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBCLUAtO001358 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:30:11 GMT Message-ID: <1323725409.2731.14.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:30:09 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1323714076.24417.100.camel@phil-desktop> References: <1323477267.5309.206.camel@ted> <1323714076.24417.100.camel@phil-desktop> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: Allow do_compile_kernelmodules to use PARALLEL_MAKE X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:37:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 18:21 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 15:28 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > in base.bbclass oe_runmake says > > > > ${MAKE} ${EXTRA_OEMAKE} "$@" > > > > and > > > > conf/bitbake.conf says > > > > EXTRA_OEMAKE_prepend_task-compile = "${PARALLEL_MAKE} " > > > > hmmm so we dont parallel make if task is not called do_compile ? > > Indeed. It's been that way basically forever; I think this was to avoid > a class of problems caused by trying to run "make install" with -j. > > It's possible that the general situation has improved a bit since that > code was written and it might be interesting to try enabling it for > install as well and see what happens. I recently merged patches to default to add PARALLEL_MAKE to do_install. We have had surprisingly few issues with that. I think autotools itself got fixed and hence so did anything using it. I guess anything with broken makefiles already disables PARALLEL_MAKE so it seemed to work pretty well. Cheers, Richard