From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Riviy-0004p8-1r for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:23:54 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q05MGQWK011532; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:16:26 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10664-09; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:16:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q05MGJJ8011526 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:16:21 GMT Message-ID: <1325801780.20759.77.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: McClintock Matthew-B29882 , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:16:20 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1325763002.20759.62.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/28] Build Fixes and Updates X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:23:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 15:57 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > >> Zhenhua Luo (1): > >> linux-dtb: add multi-dtb build support and keep dtb in deploy cache > >> package > > > > This looks like it should be done in do_deploy and doesn't fix the real > > problem just adding some races in. > > Can you add a bit more info here? Should we be building all the device > trees in do_deploy? What races are added? I guess what I'm asking is why this isn't happening in kernel_do_deploy (with an append) and installing the files into ${DEPLOYDIR}? It seems to be appending to do_install instead and this confuses the purposes of the different tasks. If the files were placed into ${DEPLOYDIR} as part of do_deploy, things would be much more consistent. Cheers, Richard