From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RkgwJ-0008SM-LX for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:00:56 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0AIrQht013774 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:53:26 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13053-07 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:53:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0AIrI89013768 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:53:19 GMT Message-ID: <1326221600.23315.9.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:53:20 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1326219470.12160.107.camel@phil-desktop> References: <1326218233.23315.6.camel@ted> <1326219470.12160.107.camel@phil-desktop> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/22] Patches and Updates for M2 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:00:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:17 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 17:57 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > Khem Raj (8): > > > site/common-uclibc: Cache gl_cv_func_wcwidth_works > > > > I merged these apart from: > > default-distrovars: Define DISTRO_FEATURES_LIBC for uclibc > > I think the consensus on that common-uclibc patch (see previous > discussion on this list) was that it oughtn't to be merged. Certainly > not if: > > > uclibc: Configure UCLIBC_HAS_WCHAR based on libc-posix-clang-wchar > > distro feature > > is in, since the latter will make the value in the site file wrong. Indeed, sorry. I've reverted the former change. Cheers, Richard