From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RoZYt-0002aa-Pl for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 12:56:47 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0LBn5PS029472 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:49:05 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27250-09 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:48:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0LBmvuL029466 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:48:58 GMT Message-ID: <1327146536.10079.16.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:48:56 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1325752666-28560-1-git-send-email-liming.wang@windriver.com> <4F1A3608.70002@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] qemuppc: replace emulation of qemuppc X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:56:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 23:12 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > > On 01/05/2012 12:37 AM, Liming Wang wrote: > >> > >> Hi Richard, > >> > >> These patches are aimed to replace emulation of qemuppc from prep to > >> mac99. > >> With this new emulation, qemuppc now supports framebuffer and the network > >> works well. > >> > > Is there anything that needs to be setup differently for the runqemu > > scripts? Our sanity tests have failed after changing to the new ppc code > > and I wonder if there is something for the command line or ??? > > What type of failure ? boot ? I'm building and booting it all the time, so I can > help there. Or are you talking about something in particular like the network ? > disk ? I ran a test build and can confirm that whilst qemuppc can boot, there is no network. We need to fix the network ASAP as our automated testing depends on working network access... Cheers, Richard