From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: openembedded-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Machine dependencies validation with sstate
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:22:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1327425729.19643.113.camel@ted> (raw)
In the process of diving into the issues in bug 1916
(http://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1916), I've come up
with a good way of detecting machine specific changes to generic
PACKAGE_ARCH packages.
The idea is to have two identical machines, qemux86 and qemux86copy.
These can be setup by:
$ cp meta/conf/machine/qemux86.conf meta/conf/machine/qemux86copy.conf
[Add SRCREV entry for qemux86copy to meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb]
$ cp -r meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase-4.47/qemux86 meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase-4.47/qemux86copy
[Add PACKAGE_ARCH_qemux86copy to meta/recipes-core/netbase/netbase_4.47.bb]
[Add RRECOMMENDS_${PN}_qemux86copy to meta/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gstreamer_0.10.35.bb]
You can then generate all of the sigdata files for two machine builds by
running the following commands. The nice thing about these is that you
don't have to run a complete build, it just writes out the data the
build would have generated:
rm tmp/stamps/*/*sigdata*
MACHINE=qemux86 bitbake core-image-sato -S
find tmp/stamps/i586-poky-linux/ -name \*sigdata* | sort > l1
find tmp/stamps/all-poky-linux/ -name \*sigdata* | sort >> l1
MACHINE=qemux86copy bitbake core-image-sato -S
find tmp/stamps/i586-poky-linux/ -name \*sigdata* | sort > l2
find tmp/stamps/all-poky-linux/ -name \*sigdata* | sort >> l2
and then comparing the files l1 and l2, you can see which sigdata files
differ. Running bitbake-diffsigs on the files, e.g.:
bitbake-diffsigs tmp/stamps/all-poky-linux/x11-common-0.1-r44.do_package_write_ipk.sigdata.*
can show what changed and you can then consider whether that is a valid
change and how it might be avoided if necessary. This is how some of the
patches I've just posted were developed.
Comparing qemux86 and qemux86copy as above with core-image-sato now
yields only two differences, in the package_write* tasks of iptables and
gstreamer. This is due to the dependencies these two recipes have on
kernel-module-* packages which in turn depend on linux-yocto which is
machine specific. As yet I can't find a good way to avoid the kernel
dependencies. If we could break debian.bbclass's hold in the
kernel-module case (which never get renamed), that would be one way to
avoid this problem.
I thought people might find this intersting and it was worth documenting
in the list archives if nothing else.
Cheers,
Richard
next reply other threads:[~2012-01-24 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-24 17:22 Richard Purdie [this message]
2012-01-30 16:48 ` Machine dependencies validation with sstate McClintock Matthew-B29882
2012-02-03 16:46 ` Richard Purdie
2012-02-16 13:44 ` Martin Jansa
2012-02-16 13:54 ` Martin Jansa
2012-02-16 14:22 ` Martin Jansa
2012-02-22 13:05 ` Martin Jansa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1327425729.19643.113.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox