From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrpKS-0000LF-QM for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:23:21 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0UBFTLe022885 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:15:29 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22428-04 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:15:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0UBFJLm022878 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:15:21 GMT Message-ID: <1327922122.7807.59.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:15:22 +0000 In-Reply-To: <59F89C99-2B25-4679-A565-B108ACAF1BFC@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <1327847180-25415-1-git-send-email-ulf@emagii.com> <59F89C99-2B25-4679-A565-B108ACAF1BFC@dominion.thruhere.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] mirrors.bbclass: Add new KERNELORG_MIRROR = ftp.sunet.se X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:23:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 16:35 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 29 jan. 2012, om 15:26 heeft Ulf Samuelsson het volgende geschreven: > > > www.kernel.org is missing a lot of files. > > Add the "ftp.sunet.se" mirror containing many missing files. > > Since the files on kernel.org were removed because they might be > compromised, why do we add a mirror that has kept the compromised > files? Its a valid question. In our favour, we have checksums on all the SRC_URIs these days and I look suspiciously at anyone changing then other than at version upgrade time. We therefore have more protection in place than most for this kind of problem. Cheers, Richard