From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuKlo-0003V3-H4 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:21:57 +0100 Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=[192.168.114.6]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuKe6-00051B-0K for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:13:58 +0100 Message-ID: <1328519623.2716.208.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:13:43 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1624cca695c5baf08d376297f7278732dbcbfba6.1328509284.git.xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com> References: <1624cca695c5baf08d376297f7278732dbcbfba6.1328509284.git.xiaofeng.yan@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] glib-2.0: Don't check function qsort_r X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:21:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 14:41 +0800, Xiaofeng Yan wrote: > From: Xiaofeng Yan > > function "g_qsort_with_data" has two kinds of realization. One calls qsort_r > from libglib, the other realize itself. > qsort_r from libglib cause sort error. > For fixing this problem no checking "qsort_r" in configure.ac. > > [YOCTO #1959] This description doesn't make much sense. libglib is part of glib-2.0 itself; I guess you meant to say that qsort_r is from libc6. But, even leaving that aside, if qsort_r is broken then the appropriate patch would be to fix it, not just to hack glib to use a standalone implementation. So this patch seems like the wrong thing by any measure. Does glibc's own testsuite also have failures for qsort_r? p.