From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuL0B-0003mS-EW; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:36:48 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q169Sjt8015434; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:28:45 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14404-07; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:28:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q169SXDX015427 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:28:35 GMT Message-ID: <1328520520.24049.7.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:28:40 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by tim.rpsys.net id q169Sjt8015434 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [oe] Buildhistory, was Re: do rootfs does not create log files X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:36:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 10:04 +0100, Andreas M=C3=BCller wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Koen Kooi = wrote: > > > > Op 5 feb. 2012, om 23:16 heeft Andreas M=C3=BCller het volgende gesch= reven: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> is it a bug or a feature that do_rootfs does not create the package > >> information (packed_files / packages ..) in a deploy sub-folder did = I > >> miss a switch for this? > > > > It's this one: http://git.angstrom-distribution.org/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/= meta-angstrom/commit/?id=3D370a884b2372b7ddd5f0876119b5f28a2b20074f > > > > The matching commit it missing, but you can add something like this t= o your local.conf: > > > > INHERIT +=3D "buildhistory" > > BUILDHISTORY_COMMIT =3D "1" > > BUILDHISTORY_DIR =3D "/data/ssd/OE/buildhistory/" > > > > That will create a tree that looks like https://github.com/Angstrom-d= istribution/buildhistory/. It it's missing a feature that you were using = in testlab, let us know and Paul or I will try to add it to buildhistory. > > > > regards, > > > > Koen > Thanks for the info - will give buildhistory a test. >=20 > Without having experience on buildhistory I have a question: As you > might know there was a discussion about the order of packages in > bitbake.conf [1]. I have no idea of the workflow for this issue: >=20 > 1. Enable buildhistory as said above > 2. Build from scratch > 3. change the PACKAGES order in bitbake.conf > 4. ?? >=20 > If I just rebuild without any PR-bumps I assume buildhistory can do > nothing for me. Correct? Do two build from scratch, one with the changed PACKAGES and one without. Keep the same build history data in both builds. You'll then see the differences between them recorded. (Or diff the buildhistory from the two builds). Cheers, Richard