From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rwy8J-0006uU-Ir for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:48:03 +0100 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rwy0S-0003r2-5M for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:39:56 +0100 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:39:55 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <04705556464a6e41642962da40f0e17847ee3483.1328510188.git.raj.khem@gmail.com> <4F30DC16.1050506@linux.intel.com> <4F314A73.8070406@linux.intel.com> <20120207231245.GA13160@sakrah.homelinux.org> <4F31BF7B.4040303@linux.intel.com> <54DBF0D0-65DA-4444-8EF5-3E14ED8FE44F@dominion.thruhere.net> <20120213074852.GA3832@jama.jama.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1329147596.14363.90.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/20] zlib: Upgrade 1.2.5 -> 1.2.6 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:48:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 05:23 -0800, Steve Sakoman wrote: > We need to find a way to prevent or warn of disruptive changes like > this zlib patch. Aren't these sorts of things meant to get tested on the Yocto autobuilder before being merged? I thought that was how it was supposed to work. p.