From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RzyW1-0003da-4B for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:48:57 +0100 Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=[192.168.114.6]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RzyNz-0005wA-Ru for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:40:39 +0100 Message-ID: <1329864016.2591.195.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:40:16 +0000 In-Reply-To: <4F441987.2010800@linux.intel.com> References: <1328889675-9864-1-git-send-email-andrei@gherzan.ro> <4F441987.2010800@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] openssl: Move libcrypto to base_libdir X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:48:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 14:24 -0800, Saul Wold wrote: > On 02/10/2012 08:01 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > > This fix is for dhclient. It needs libcrypto at runtime and if > > libcrypto is in libdir, it's path can be inaccessible on systems > > where /usr is on nfs for example or dhclient is needed before > > /usr is mounted. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan > > --- > > ...001-openssl-Move-libcrypto-to-base_libdir.patch | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl.inc | 10 +++- > > .../recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_1.0.0g.bb | 2 +- > > 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/0001-openssl-Move-libcrypto-to-base_libdir.patch > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/0001-openssl-Move-libcrypto-to-base_libdir.patch b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/0001-openssl-Move-libcrypto-to-base_libdir.patch > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..b101d8c > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/0001-openssl-Move-libcrypto-to-base_libdir.patch > > @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ > > +From ac1fe1490e997fb8fd91ec13b675d38efcc65775 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > +From: Andrei Gherzan > > +Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 00:03:38 +0200 > > +Subject: [PATCH] openssl: Move libcrypto to base_libdir > > + > > +This fix is for dhclient. It needs libcrypto at runtime and if > > +libcrypto is in libdir, it's path can be inaccessible on systems > > +where /usr is on nfs for example or dhclient is needed before > > +/usr is mounted. > > + > Seems to be missing Upstream-Status Really? There doesn't seem to be any genuine patch here. As far as I can tell, that 0001-openssl-Move-libcrypto-to-base_libdir.patch file is some old version of the changeset which has somehow gotten checked in as a git format-patch'd diff. I think it should be deleted, not given an upstream-status. p.