From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S0ACD-0003YE-Dd for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:17:18 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1MB8vTJ027176 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:08:57 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25930-09 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:08:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1MB8kfF027170 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:08:48 GMT Message-ID: <1329908926.20261.103.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:08:46 +0000 In-Reply-To: <9C41C640-9B88-45D6-B0DE-6C9F317B43BB@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <04705556464a6e41642962da40f0e17847ee3483.1328510188.git.raj.khem@gmail.com> <4F30DC16.1050506@linux.intel.com> <4F314A73.8070406@linux.intel.com> <20120207231245.GA13160@sakrah.homelinux.org> <4F31BF7B.4040303@linux.intel.com> <54DBF0D0-65DA-4444-8EF5-3E14ED8FE44F@dominion.thruhere.net> <20120213074852.GA3832@jama.jama.net> <1329865279.20261.92.camel@ted> <9C41C640-9B88-45D6-B0DE-6C9F317B43BB@dominion.thruhere.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/20] zlib: Upgrade 1.2.5 -> 1.2.6 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:17:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 09:03 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 22 feb. 2012, om 00:01 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > > > On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 05:23 -0800, Steve Sakoman wrote: > >> Indeed! I gave up on trying to determine an exhaustive list and just > >> blew away tmp and sstate and rebuilt everything -- including package > >> repositories :-( > >> > >> We need to find a way to prevent or warn of disruptive changes like > >> this zlib patch. For those of us trying to make a living using Yocto, > >> losing a day of productivity to things like this really stings. > > > > I agree this change sucked and showed us we have some real issues. I > > will point out that if we had been using the basichash signature > > generator, it would likely have picked up this change and rebuild all > > the appropriate pieces. > > Rebuild yes, but not fix all the -dev packages in the feeds. The PR service using the hash changes would have allowed that though... Cheers, Richard