From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S0FQM-0007nd-BG for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:52:15 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1MGhsHU031202 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:43:54 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30565-07 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:43:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1MGhjP7031196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:43:46 GMT Message-ID: <1329929026.20261.182.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:43:46 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1329923198.20261.160.camel@ted> <2032247.UMYq2ztU6u@helios> <1329926977.20261.168.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] A script to clean obsolete sstate cache files X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:52:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 14:16 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > If you look at *my* first reply to this thread I just asked him to > resend it based on OE-Core - as he already did - so I could give it a > test. This seemed quite friendly from my POV and he didn't complain. You'll also notice I directed my comments to Koen's reply, not yours. Since we're on the subject though, I do believe there is marginal value in asking someone to rebase a single patch you could have just as easily downloaded and applied yourself. I am respectful and protective of people's time and in this case I think there are better ways things could have been handled. Overall though my main objective was to avoid these "Please rebase on OE-Core????!!!!?" type messages and I think we've figured out a way to do that. > If people dislike it, it is better if they show up and don't hide behind you. We have many different people involved with the project with different personalities and cultural backgrounds. Open source projects should be as open, inclusive and friendly as possible in my view. We do have some participants who get put off by the form of some of the replies on list and would prefer not to get involved in what could potentially become "flame war" type discussions. I'd even personally like to avoid them to as they kill my productivity but sadly my role means I cannot. I am happy to listen to people's concerns and do what I can to improve things where I see opportunities. I only received comments from one other person about this specific thread and they have responded on list. I have received many different comments on the general topic from previous similar threads though so I do have an idea of some people's feelings on this topic. I happen to have chosen this moment in time to try and resolve the issue. I don't see an problem in any of these things. Cheers, Richard