From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S0iuo-0008TM-Sx for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:21:39 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1O0DHEk030975 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:13:17 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30295-07 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:13:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1O0D7dR030950 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:13:09 GMT Message-ID: <1330042388.25226.3.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:13:08 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <5c6b81ada0814d1947d89120867bb9a4a5b0fa85.1330004039.git.richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> <32a9dc576917167f6c2392c822abf54fba58eaf2.1330004039.git.richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] libusb-compat: Address unpackaged files warning X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:21:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 12:53 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:38, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > WARNING: For recipe libusb-compat, the following files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package: > > WARNING: /lib/libusb.la > > Why not drop it? I want to be consistent. We currently package the .la files. We've also recently witnessed what can happen when they're removed... Cheers, Richard