From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S0zC9-0006nD-60 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:44:37 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1OHaBT8009782; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:36:11 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09722-01; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:36:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1OHa2kM009775 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:36:03 GMT Message-ID: <1330104962.8430.4.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: McClintock Matthew-B29882 , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:36:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1330088135.32006.14.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Luo Zhenhua-B19537 Subject: Re: Using external source trees with OE-Core X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:44:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 16:55 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > We do something very similar to this currently. I've pushed what we > are using here: > > https://github.com/mattsm/meta-fsl-local-sdk > > It would be nice to consolidate all the required bits upstream... =) I would warn you that there is code in there that is clearly inappropriate for OE-Core. It would also explain that bug report you sent me which referenced "do_populate_sysroot_post" and I asked what local modifications you had and you said "none" ;-). Does the patch in this thread take care of your needs regarding the srctree and clean classes? For cleanobjs, I can see advantages in merging something like that into the core... Cheers, Richard