From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S3CIe-0003Rb-B1 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:08:28 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q21K00lH021782 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:00:00 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20680-08 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 19:59:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q21JxpIr021776 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 19:59:52 GMT Message-ID: <1330631993.12133.11.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:59:53 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20120301182546.GK3831@jama.jama.net> References: <85003f1e060b6a4406bdde5c48fb9a09bea2ee05.1330242184.git.Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> <4F4F4011.2080303@gmail.com> <20120301094052.GB3831@jama.jama.net> <20120301182546.GK3831@jama.jama.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/5] bitbake.conf: remove TARGET_ARCH from in SDKPATH X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 20:08:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 19:25 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:40:52AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:23:29AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On 02/25/2012 11:49 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > > +SDK_NAME_PREFIX = "oecore" > > > > > > should this be weak assignment > > > > Yeah, probably could be (I'm not overwritting this from my distro conf > > so I haven't tried), but SDK_NAME assignment also wasn't weak and distros > > were overwritting it. > > > > Someone with custom SDK_NAME(_PREFIX) please try and send patch. > > And we should change TARGET_ARCH in SDK_NAME to > PACKAGE_ARCH or TUNE_PKGARCH > > because meta-toolchain-gmae for armv7a ends in > oecore-i686-arm-toolchain-gmae-20120229.tar.bz2 > and for armv4t with similar name (I was lucky that it took more then day to > build) > oecore-i686-arm-toolchain-gmae-20120301.tar.bz2 Agreed... Cheers, Richard