From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S8B2z-0004jx-Rk for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:48:54 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2FDe87g022215 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:40:08 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21190-10 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:40:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2FDduKq022178 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:39:59 GMT Message-ID: <1331818796.18586.85.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:39:56 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: boost breaks on rebuild X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:48:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 15:28 -0700, Steve Sakoman wrote: > NOTE: package boost-1.49.0-r2.0: task do_compile: Failed > > I don't have a fix for this but wanted to document the failure. > > As with all the other failures of this type, a -c cleansstate and > rebuild is the workaround. > > It feels to me like there are quite a few recipes that don't handle > rebuilds -- I seem to run into a few after every pull. Agreed, there is a problem here. I've filed the bug: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2123 since I think we systematically need to work through these and eradicate them. An alternative to fix some of the compile cases would be to run a "make clean" before the make. I suspect this would annoy people and its a shame to do that because of a few broken recipes though... Cheers, Richard